Graham Toal writes: > Hahaha! Isn't that just like the thing - the owner of a 'full disclosure' > list resorts to security by obscurity when it's *his* machine that's > vulnerable. I really don't see your point here. He said something to the effect of "I fixed the problem myself and the package's author is putting together a package with the details." Apparently an exploitation script has already been posted. Security through *obscurity*? By what definition of the word? -- Steve Davis <strat@ksu.ksu.edu> Kansas State University